He is a close Sangha friend of mine who was just diagnosed with cancer.
For details, please read: http://realkadampa.wordpress.com/2012/10/04/prayers-for-paul-ashton/
He is a close Sangha friend of mine who was just diagnosed with cancer.
For details, please read: http://realkadampa.wordpress.com/2012/10/04/prayers-for-paul-ashton/
In the State Department, we rotate jobs every 2-3 years throughout our career. The rationale behind this is simple: the end goal they are after is forging us into Ambassadors, but an Ambassador needs to be good at everything. Normally, after spending 2-3 years in a given job, you have learned probably 80-90% of everything there is to learn about the job. Of course, you could always go deeper and become more of an expert, but the rate of learning shows diminishing returns. So it becomes time to move on and gain a new 80-90% set of skills doing something else. In short, moving around all of the time helps us avoid getting stuck in a rut.
An additional rationale for moving people around all of the time is to avoid the mistake of false universal assumptions. Very often, when we are in one place (or situation) for a long time we get assimilated into the view of that place. There are two dangers to this. First, we can start to mistakenly think that everybody must view things in the same way as they do where you are at; and second, you can start to believe that the view of this area is superior to all others and therefore lose your appreciation for multiple perspectives. In short, moving around all of the time helps us avoid being narrow-minded.
Within the human resources department, there is somebody called your “assignments officer.” Their job is to match the needs of the Department with your career development objectives all in the optic of a long-term plan of helping you cultivate all of the skills you will need to operate effectively at the highest levels.
When you think about it, this is exactly the same as what happens within the Kadampa family. The long-term goal is to train people up to become Ambassadors for all of the Buddhas (fully qualified Kadampa Spiritual Guides). We are all moved around again and again. Gen Lekma once said, “be wary of the day you get too comfortable, because that is the day Venerable Geshe-la will move you!” A lot of people looking at this process, particularly as it relates to Resident Teachers, from the outside mistakenly view these constant moves as “punishments” or view VGL as “vindictive.” Not at all! He is rather telling us it is time to move on to our next assignment. Sometimes we embrace this, sometimes we resist. Sometimes he asks us to go somewhere, sometimes he fires us. But the goal is always the same – it is time for us to move on so we can build new skills and realize new things.
For most Kadampas, however, we dont’ receive emails from VGL telling us where to go next. So are we deprived of having an enlightened assignments officer? No. Rather, our assignments officer is the Dharma Protector, Dorje Shugden. His long term goal is to forge us int the Buddha we need to become, he knows what realizations we need to gain and in what order, and his job is to arrange all the outer and inner conditions we need to gain those realizations. Of course, we have to do our spiritual assignments, but Dorje Shugden arranges for us the assignments we need to take the next step on our spiritual path. Sometimes our moving on will be joyful and sometimes it will be traumatic, but in both cases it will be what we need to continue our spiritual growth.
Your turn: Describe a major career or life change you have gone through and what did you learn from making that change?
Several people have contacted me recently asking for my thoughts on the recent turmoil in the world since I work for the State Department. Before I provide my thoughts, I want to be very clear that I am providing my personal thoughts as a Kadampa not as official U.S. position on the crisis. In no way should anything I say be misconstrued as U.S. policy, rather these are my own personal spiritual lessons I draw from recent events. Our goal as Kadampas is to use all world events to realize how the Dharma is the truth.
First, we need to make a very clear distinction between legitimate freedom of expression and illegitimate expression. In a free society, one can fully defend the legal right of the person who made the video to do so; yet at the same time as a human being we can condemn unequivocally the content of his message with our own free speech. He has the right to say what he thinks, and I have to respect that right, but we also have the right to robustly disagree with his message and intentions with our speech. In fact, the best response to bad free speech is not to restrict his speech, but rather for the rest of us to drown out his bad speech with our virtuous speech disagreeing with his insulting message.
Likewise, the people in the Muslim world who were offended by this video have every right to protest the content of this video, but they have no right whatsoever to express themselves through violence. If we are to be consistent, we need to equally defend the right of the people in these newly freed societies to protest whatever they want, but at the same time say that we unequivocally condemn their expressing themselves though violence. As Kadampas, the bottom line is the same: divisive and hurtful speech is morally wrong and should be condemned. Individually, we should refrain from it always seeing how destructive it is.
One of the main problems here is false generalizations. In the Muslim world, some are falsely coming to the conclusion that all Americans or Westerners have insulting attitudes towards Islam and Muslims. And some in the West falsely generalize that all Muslims are fanatics who take to rioting when their religion is insulted. Both attitudes are wrong. It is a very small minority in the West who hold such intolerant and insulting attitudes towards other religions, and it is a very small minority of Muslims who take to violence when their religion is insulted. The majority in the West are ashamed to have such bigots in our midst who insult other religions, and the majority in the Muslim world are ashamed to have people who resort to violence when insulted. It is like Terry Jones, the lunatic who wanted to burn the Korans, yes, he has the right to do it, but we can all vocally say we disagree fundamentally with his actions. If one person does something stupid and thousands, in fact millions, express their disagreement with what the person said or did, then it is more difficult for others to falsely generalize that all Americans think like he does. Likewise, if a few fanatics resort to violence and thousands, in fact millions, peacefully protest, then it is more difficult for people in the West to falsely generalize that all Muslims are terrorist fanatics.
As Kadampas, we can appreciate how an understanding of emptiness is the antidote to all of these problems. When we grasp at inherent existence, we grasp at there being only one valid point of view – there is one inherently true perspective on things. Therefore, we become threatened when people think differently than us because either they are right or I am right, but we both can’t be right. Most religious wars have been fought due to this ignorance, with zealots violently defending that they have a monopoly on the truth and any who disagree must be destroyed. Ridiculous! When we realize emptiness, we can very comfortably respect other religions as being valid for those who follow that religion. Islam doesn’t teach violence, ignorant people misunderstand Islam to commit violence. Likewise, Christianity doesn’t teach hate, ignorant people misunderstand it and become hateful. Islam and Christianity alike are religions of peace and love. Islam works for some people to become more virtuous and Christianity works for others to become more virtuous. As Kadampas, we can celebrate and respect any system of thought that encourages people to become more virtuous and condemn any system of thought that encourages people to become hateful and violent. We don’t need everybody to follow the same point of view because our understanding of emptiness opens our mind to multiple points of view existing harmoniously and simultaneously.
I think we need to make a distinction between understanding delusion and agreeing with it. We can understand why delusion is arising without condoning it or agreeing with it. I think we need to view the situation from a broader perspective. This video is not the cause of the recent violence, it is merely the match that lit the fire. There are large swaths of the world that have been living under oppression for decades (and in some cases centuries). These people are now freeing themselves from such oppression. It is a historical fact that the West has a long history of crusades and support for oppressive dictators. It is very understandable why those who have been the victims of such oppression will be angry at those who have oppressed them and at those who have backed their oppressors. Our historical fear of Muslims and their radicalization are two halves of the same dynamic – namely that extremists on both sides feed off of one another and use the existence of the other to justify their own positions. We have been wrong to support oppressors (even George Bush realized this) and they have been wrong to resort to violence in opposition to that oppression.
Ghandi showed the way. He appealed to the virtuous values of his oppressor while exhorting his followers to renounce giving those oppressors further cause to oppress them by resorting to violence. Such an approach brings out the best of both sides. So I can simultaneously understand why some people in the Muslim world are angry with the West while at the same time unequivocally condemn any violent expression. I can appeal to the virtuous qualities embedded within the views of both sides as the answer to the wrong actions of both sides. It is our mutual fear of the other which has driven both sides to wrong actions, and it is only through both sides applying effort to mutually understand and respect one another that peace can be found. Ignorance and hatred bring conflict. Love, wisdom and respect for others bring inner peace, and inner peace brings outer peace. As Kadampas, recent events can teach us clearly that ignorance and hatred are the sources of all problems and wisdom and love are the sources of all good.
Finally, as Kadampas we should never underestimate the power of prayer. From our own side, we need to oppose our own deluded reactions or views on recent events, but for others we should pray that they find wisdom and love in their hearts. Holy beings have the power to bless the minds of others to move in virtuous directions. Our prayers will be as effective as our faith is strong, as our realization of the emptiness of ourselves, others and the Buddhas is complete, and as our motivation is pure. Sometimes we think we pray only as a last resort when nothing else will work. The reality is we should pray as our first resort because it is, in the end, the power of our prayers that enable the other things we might do to actually work. In particular, we should pray to Dorje Shugden that he bless the minds of everyone on the planet that recent events become powerful causes of enlightenment for all those observing or participating in them. Finally, we can pray that all those who have died as a result of recent events take rebirth in the pure land of their choice.
Once again, all of the above are my personal views and should be interpreted as such.
On July 23rd of this year, my family went to the U.S. for six weeks. While of course I am sad to see them go and I miss them, I decided to really try use my Summer for retreat. When I was in Geneva, I had the great good fortune to have a large chunk of my summer off where I could focus on the Dharma, go to Manjushri and the Summer Festival, etc. This was really precious time for me, and it is one of the main reasons why I switched to teaching as a career at that time. The last couple of summers were difficult in that respect, but this year I had a great opportunity. I remember what Venerable Tharchin said: if you have an opportunity to focus on your Dharma practice and you seize the opportunity, you create the causes to have even better opportunities to practice in the future. But if you have a good opportunity and you squander it, you burn up the karma on your mind to have any time to practice and you will face more and more obstacles in your practice. Principally for this reason, I made this summer my retreat.
But, as per my karma right now, my retreat had to be a non-conventional one. Normally, when we do retreat, we want to cease all of our normal activities, go into solitude and focus on training our mind. But I had to work and deal with my normal business during this time. One of the biggest things my new life has taught me is that everything depends upon your mind. If I adopt a “mind of retreat,” then I can transform any set of appearances into an experience of doing retreat. And if we lack such a mind of retreat, even if externally we have all of the conditions of a retreat, we are not actually doing retreat at all. So I view whatever appears to my mind once I “go into retreat” as the conditions that Dorje Shugden has arranged for me to train my mind with. Different experiences at work, etc., then become emanted appearances during my retreat. With such a view, we then naturally “take the bait” and work on training our mind in whatever way seems the most approrpiate given the circumstances. In this way, our normal life becomes our retreat. So anyways, this is what I tried to do this summer!
So what are my main conclusions:
I am adding this post to the “about this blog” page because I think it helps clarify its nature and purpose.
Some people confuse reliance upon the spiritual guide with fundamentalism. Venerable Geshe-la explains in Clear Light of Bliss that we should not rely on just the words of Dharma, but rather their meaning. If we rely on just the words of Dharma, there is a danger that we can become fundamentalist in our understanding of the Dharma. Fundamentalism arises when we become attached to the literal words of the Dharma at the expense of its meaning. The literal meaning of the scriptures are correct when interpreted through the lens of how those words are understood by the people who live at the time they were written. But as cultures change with the flow of time, those same words in a different cultural context produce different meanings. Our job as practitioners who wish to carry the lineage forward is to gain an understanding of the meaning of the Dharma and carry that forward. The words that express that meaning will vary from culture to culture and time to time, but the meaning itself is universal and timeless. Understanding this distinction protects us against the extreme of fundamentalism.
Those who authorize themselves to contemplate and meditate on the Dharma, meaning they test the Dharma they have heard (or read) against their own experience and who develop their own examples, analogies and wordings of the meaning of Dharma, can sometimes be accused by those who remain tightly attached to the literal words of scripture of causing the Dharma to degenerate. I respectfully disagree. In fact, I would argue that such a literalist approach in effect causes the degeneration of Dharma because it stunts the growth of the Dharma in the minds of living beings.
To understand this, we must make a distinction between the definitive Dharma and interpretative Dharma. The definitive Dharma is the inner meaning of the Dharma as understood validly by the minds of superior beings. It is universal and timeless. The interpretative Dharma is how the definitive Dharma is expressed in a given cultural-temporal context. The meaning of the Dharma in ancient Tibet and modern New York City is exactly the same. But its interpretative presentation can be quite different. If we fail to make this distinction, there is a risk that we can reject and criticise a perfectly valid interpretative presentation because it doesn’t correspond with our own culturally literalist understanding of the Dharma. In my view, Venerable Geshe-la’s greatest contribution is he has perfectly transmitted the definitive meaning of the Kadam Dharma into a completely new cultural-temporal context (the modern world). The book Modern Buddhism is, in my view, the culmination of his efforts. It is the crown jewel of all of his works. This doesn’t mean all of the other books are not the transmission of the timeless wisdom of the Kadampa into the modern world, rather it means we can fruitfully interpret all of the other books through the lens of and following the presentation of Modern Buddhism.
This logic also applies at the level of an individual practitioner. Just as there are those who criticise a modern presentation of the Dharma, there are others who accept the modern presentation of the Dharma but then make the same mistake as the literalists within the context of their own tradition. These people misinterpret reliance upon the spiritual guide alone as meaning they are not authorized to contemplate and meditate on the Dharma. When confronted with an insight that is not explicitly in Venerable Geshe-la’s teachings they say, “I don’t remember Venerable Geshe-la ever saying that” and they reject the insight on those grounds alone. Likewise when they come up with their own insights through their own practice they fail to do anything with them because they are not certain they are reliable because they never heard Geshe-la explicitly say the given idea. Such an approach to our Dharma practice is safe and good, but it is not good enough. Taken to an extreme, such an approach can make our Dharma understanding quite rigid, and we develop within ourselves a “parrot like Dharma” not a “heart-felt Dharma.” A parrot like Dharma is good, but it is not good enough.
To understand this, it is useful to understand the three wisdom and the three lineages. The three wisdoms are the wisdom arising from listening, the wisdom arising from contemplation and the wisdom arising from meditation. These three can be understood as follows. First we listen to (or read) the Dharma and gain an understanding of the wisdom of others. For example, when we listen to Venerable Geshe-la teach or read his books, we can become very familiar with all that he says and that understanding will give rise to a certain level of wisdom within our mind. This is very good, but it is not good enough. We shouldn’t stop there.
Just as there are different cultures and temporal contexts, so too each individual practitioner has a different personal mental context and experience set. Somebody who has spent their whole life in modern America has a different mental context and experience set than somebody who has spent their whole life in modern Brazil or modern China. Even two people who both spent their whole life in modern America will have two very different mental contexts and experience sets. Every individual in fact has a unique mental context and experience set. Just as the great lineage holders like Atisha, Je Tsongkhapa and (I would argue) Venerable Geshe-la took the definitive meaning of the Dharma and expressed it interpretatively in different cultural-temporal contexts, so too each individual practitioner must take (their understanding of) the definitive meaning of the Dharma and make it their own as understood through their own individual mental context and experience set. We do this through our own contemplation of and meditation on the Dharma.
When we contemplate the Dharma we take the wisdom we have gained through listening and we test its validity in the context of our own life experience and understanding. For example, I am an early middle-aged American economist diplomat father of five. This is the context of my life experience, so I test the validity of the Dharma in the context of my world and experience. When I do this, the Dharma becomes true for me. I will develop my own examples, analogies and interpretative expressions (wordings) which generate within my own mind the actual meaning of the Dharma in my own mind. I will have transferred what was the wisdom of somebody else (my teachers) into my own wisdom. The Dharma will be true for me. This is the wisdom arisen from contemplation. Venerable Tharchin says that our own examples, analogies and reasonings developed through our contemplation of the Dharma are actually more powerful for us because they make the Dharma true for us. This does not mean they are more powerful for others, though. Each practitioner must develop their own understandings through contemplating the Dharma they have heard (or read).
The insights we gain from our own contemplation of the Dharma, these insights that make the meaning of the Dharma come alive in our own mind, are our actual objects of placement meditation. Just as contemplation functions to transform the wisdom arisen from listening into the wisdom arisen from contemplation, so too placement meditation on the wisdom arisen from contemplation transforms the wisdom arisen from contemplation into the wisdom arisen from meditation. Put in more practical terms when we listen (or read) we gain an understanding of the wisdom of others. When we contemplate we transform this wisdom into our own personal wisdom. When we meditate we make this personal wisdom, as Venerable Tharchin describes it, “an acquisition of our personality.” For example, first we generate an undertanding of what is compassion. Then we generate compassion in our own mind. Then we become a compassionate person.
Understanding the three wisdoms helps us understand the three lineages of Kadam Dharma. The true lineage is not the words written on paper or uttered by the guru, rather the true lineage is the continuum of direct realization of the definitive meaning of Dharma from teacher to disciple. There is probably a technical name for it, but I call the three lineages the outer lineage, the inner lineage and the secret lineage. The outer lineage is the wisdom arisen from listening (or reading). I call it the outer lineage because its basis is a manifest object, namely the words on paper or the words of or examples set by our lineage gurus. The inner lineage is the wisdom arisen from contemplation. I call it the inner lineage because its basis is a hidden object, namely the personal examples, analogies and experiences within the mind of an individual practitioner. The secret lineage is the wisdom arisen from meditation. I call it the secret lineage because it is only open to those who gain personal experience of the Dharma and make the realization of it an acquisition of their personality. The definitive secret lineage is the Dharma as directly realized with our own very subtle mind of great bliss. This lineage only arises in the minds of qualified highest yoga tantra practitioners.
How do we know whether our understandings or insights gained through contemplation or meditation are reliable? There is of course the danger when we contemplate or meditate on the Dharma that we can generate wrong understandings and mistake them for being definitive meanings. So how do we protect ourselves against that? Like a good scientist testing their hypotheses, there are several tests we can perform. First, we can ask ourselves, “does this insight or understanding contradict any known instruction?” If yes, try again. If no, we can apply the second test, “is this insight or understanding the natural consequence of all known instructions?” If no, try again. If yes, we can apply the third test, “Dorje Shugden, if this understanding is reliable may it flourish within my mind, if it is not please reveal to me how it is wrong and what is in fact correct.” Dorje Shugden is a Dharma protector. He does not only protect the outer pure lineage of Je Tsongkhapa, but also the inner and secret lineages. We request him to confirm correct understandings and to sabotage incorrect understandings. If we replace our own attachment to our own views with a faith in Dorje Shugden, he will ensure we always stay on the correct inner and secret paths.
How does all of this relate to this blog? This blog can be understood as me putting into my own words my understanding of the Dharma. It is my interpretative expression of the inner universal meanings I have understood. It should NEVER be misinterpreted as me attempting to poffer definitive meanings of the Dharma. The only truly reliable Dharma texts are those provided to us by our lineage gurus. The meanings gained from contemplating and meditating on those are reliable. In the spirit of Shantideva, this blog is my putting into my own words what I have understood. For me, putting the meaning of Dharma into my own words is a method for clarifying, deepening and consolidating my own understandings. If other people receive some benefit from it, then all the better. But no reader should ever confuse the words written in this blog as being intended to be offered as definitive, qualified Dharma. Rather, it is a sharing of my own experience and understanding.
My hope is simple: If what I write in this blog is wrong, I hope others will help point out the errors of my thinking so that I can improve my understanding. If other Kadampa practitioners are coming to similar conclusions through their own listening to, contemplating of and meditating on the Dharma, then the blog can provide a platform for the sharing of such experience.
| It is not just ’May I take my place in VGL’s mandala,’ it is “May I fulfill my role within VGL’s mandala.” |
| I make requests as follows: |
| 1. I entrust my life to you, please do with me what you wish. |
| 2. Please protect and guide my retreat. |
| 3. Please help me to be ready to leave by the end of this life. |
| 4. May my every action be aimed at building my pure land, so that I may guide ALB1 from the deepest hell to the highest enlightenment. |
| 5. May I take my place and fulfill my role within VGL’s mandala. |
At the Summer Festival this year, Gen-la Dekyong said something astounding. She said that Venerable Geshe-la admits to having only one realization: “Faith in the wisdom Buddha Je Tsongkhapa. But this is enough.” This was a message she emphasized many times during her teachings. It was clear that her main and indeed only practice is reliance upon her Spiritual Guide. This is our Guru’s main practice, and so therefore all of his teachings should be viewed through this lens.
How can we understand this? First, we must understand who is Je Tsongkhapa and second we understand how faith alone is enough. Who is the wisdom Buddha Je Tsongkhapa? He is the synthesis of all three jewels in Kadampa form. He is the embodiment of all good in Kadampa form. He is the union of all of the compassion, wisdom and spiritual power of all of the Buddhas in Kadampa form. According to Highest Yoga Tantra he is known as Guru Sumati Buddha Heruka. Guru means he is by nature our Spiritual Guide. Sumati means he is the Je Tsongkhapa of Sutra. Buddha means he is Buddha Shakyamuni. Heruka means he is Buddha Heruka, in particular Dharmakaya Heruka. Each of these four are aspects of one being, him. In short, he is the embodiment of the Kadampa path of Sutra and Tantra. For us Kadampas, he is the highest and supreme object of refuge. Within our tradition, we view all of the different deities as being emanated by Je Tsongkhapa. The main deities on the Kadampa path are Buddha Shakyamuni, Buddha Vajradyara, Manjushri, Avalokitehsvara, Vajrapani, Dorje Shugden, Heruka and Vajrayogini. Reliance on Dorje Shugden deserves particular mention. We are to very clearly understand that Je Tsongkhapa and Dorje Shugden are actually two different aspects of the same being. So it is impossible for us to deny one and affirm the other. Venerable Geshe-la has also made it very clear that we are to realize this dual nature of Je Tsongkhapa and Dorje Shugden. All of the polemics with the Dalai Lama/Dorje Shugden issue can be seen in this light.
Why is faith in him enough? We can understand this by understanding the relationship between faith and realization. Faith begins with believing faith. Believing faith is we believe in an object of Dharma based on valid reasons. Valid reasons derive from logic and our own personal experience of the truth of Dharma. When we have believing faith of an object of Dharma, such as cherishing others is the root of all happiness and cherishing ourself is the root of all suffering, then we naturally come to admire that object of Dharma, marveling at how incredible it is! This is admiring faith. When we admire something, then we naturally want that thing for ourself, for example wanting to have the realization that sees the truth of cherishing self and others. This wishing faith then naturally leads to effort in our practice to gain this realization. From our effort comes the actual attainments, in this case our realization of exchanging self with others. So the meaning here is faith alone sets in motion this chain of events, which fall naturally and automatically like dominos.
So why is faith in the wisdom Buddha Je Tsongkhapa alone enough to assure the final attainment of enlightenment? Because the wisdom Buddha Je Tsongkhapa is the very embodiment of the Kadampa path. By generating believing faith in all of his amazing good qualities of body, speech and mind we will later naturally and automatically eventually attain all of the attainments of wisdom Buddha Je Tsongkhapa within our own body, speech and mind. The book Great Treasury of Merit is our root text for generating believing faith in all of his good qualities. From this it is clear that faith alone in the wisdom Buddha Je Tsongkhapa “is enough.”
It is quite significant that our Spiritual Guide has admitted to only one quality. He is doing so to reveal to us that this is the most important thing. It is not unlike Christians whose main practice is faith in Jesus. Since Western and modern culture are profoundly influenced by Christian norms and values, it seems only natural that the adaptation of Kadampa Buddhism to the modern context would function best when faith in the supreme object of refuge of the path is the main and sufficient practice. Realizing this fully will take the tradition light years ahead in terms of being able to seamlessly integrate Kadampa Buddhism into modern life. Gen-la Dekyong said that the mission of the tradition is to attain the union of modern life and Kadampa Buddhism.
This has helped me recall that reliance upon the Spiritual Guide is the sole activity on the path. But more than this, it has deepened this understanding tremendously because it provides exact specificity as to how we are to do it – namely by generating faith in the wisdom Buddha Je Tsongkhapa. Thus I am going to make this my main practice at least between now and Portugal. I’m excited to get started!
Another fundamental thing I was reminded of at this Summer Festival is the importance of receiving teachings. Unfortunately, due to the absolutely crazy karma that I have had over the last several years, about January 2010 I stopped doing my correspondence FP classes. I have consistently been on FP or TTP since 1995, so this marked a major milestone on my spiritual path. If I check honestly, I stopped for two reasons – one valid, one not valid. The valid reason for stopping was given all that I had going on, I simply couldn’t keep up with it, even at a very slow pace. Sometimes this may happen in life, but if we are lucky it will only be for very small patches of time. The not so valid reason is since I felt like I could successfully transform my every day into a teaching through my “faithful mind of a student” (to the extent that I had one), I didn’t feel like I needed it any more.
The problem with this second reason is it is very short-sighted. The only reason why I didn’t feel like I needed it was because I was riding high on the mountain of merit and blessings I had accumulated and received from the previous 15 years of intensive study. But how did I get that merit and those blessings in the first place? By receiving teachings and putting into practice what I was learning. Eventually this merit will exhaust itself and the blessings will dissipate and then I will fall back.
Additionally, when you are not receiving new teachings, you are not being exposed to new ideas and points of view on the Dharma. What happens then is new experiences bounce around the structure of Dharma you have already built within your mind, revealing new things about the interactions of what you know, but it doesn’t take you beyond your narrow understanding of the ocean of Dharma that has been revealed to us by our Spiritual Guide. When we are exposed to new ideas and points of view on the Dharma, the structure of Dharma within our mind not only deepens it broadens. So without new teachings, it is very easy to stagnate on the path.
Further, in general new understandings of the Dharma only arise in our mind in dependence upon oral transmission blessings. The importance of these is often under estimated. We think, yeah, they are important, but they are not that big of a deal. This view is not correct. We can understand why by considering the emptiness of receiving Dharma teachings. The Dharma is transmitted mind to mind, like a Vulcan mind meld, almost. Literally, at a profound level, what is happening when we receive teachings is the teacher is transferring/transmitting their own personal experience of the Dharma into the minds of the students. Conventionally this happens through “listening”. The mental realizations of the teacher take on a grosser form of speech. When the student “listens” to the teachings (as opposed to merely hearing them), the realization then gets transferred into the student’s mind. The more faith the student has, the more fully and deeply they “listen”. When we don’t listen to Dharma teachings, we don’t receive these oral transmission blessings, and as such we are largely on our own without a teacher. We might think that if we have a faithful mind of a student we can receive teachings directly from our guru through our daily lives. This is true, we can do this. But surely the teachings of our Spiritual Guide pass through “the sound of Dharma” more fully than they do through other sounds (due to their nature being pure). So receiving teachings through our daily life is good, but it is no substitute for receiving traditional teachings.
And this points to an important relationship. One one hand, we have the extreme of thinking that we can only receive teachings through attending traditional teachings. This view arises from a limited understanding of how the guru can reveal the Dharma to us. On the other hand, you have the extreme of thinking you don’t need any traditional teachings at all. This view falsely derives from the observation that it is possible to receive teachings through everything, therefore thinking that because that is the case I no longer need teachings. But just as the sound of Dharma carries more Dharma than non-Dharma sounds, so too the entire experience of attending teachings teaches more Dharma than our non-teaching experiences. The middle way between these two extremes is to attend as many traditional teachings as your karma allows while maintaining the faithful mind of a student in all of our daily activities so as to receive teachings through everything.
In my personal case, this means attending as many of the major festivals as my karma allows and starting up again my FP studies. I was fortunately able to make it to this Summer Festival. I can’t do the Summer Festival next year because I will be back in Washington on a mandatory training. But, since I will be in DC next Fall, I should be able to take maybe 2-3 days to attend the Fall Festival in Portugal where Venerable Geshe-la will be granting the Prajnaparamita empowerment and giving an “oral transmission” of the his new book, “The New Heart of Wisdom.” So I should really do everything I can to try attend, especially since this very well might be the last teaching Venerable Geshe-la gives before he passes on. This is a must. As far as my FP studies are concerned, what I can do is substitute one day of my normal daily practice with listening to a teaching by correspondence. This I should normally be able to do. I can also use this time I have this Summer when the family is in the U.S. to listen to as many teachings as I can. I feel very fortunate in that I am able to receive teachings from Venerable Tharchin, arguably the most experienced meditater in the tradition. For those who don’t know him, he teaches the entire tradition how to do retreat.
The point is this: each one of us has our own karmic circumstance. All of us, however, can follow the same principle – namely we receive as much traditional teachings our karma allows while viewing the rest of our experiences as teachings being revealed to us through our daily lives. This, to me, seems to be the middle way.
I just got back from the Summer Festival. I have been going to Summer Festivals every year since 1995, but due to all of the karmic changes in my life over the last few years, for the first time I wasn’t able to make it in 2010 and 2011. I tried to go to Brazil, had bought my ticket, taken my vacation time, but stupidly didn’t bother to check whether or not I needed a visa until it was too late. So this is the longest I have gone without being at a festival and reconnecting with my global spiritual family. It was so nice to be able to go to the festival, reconnect with old friends and receive live teachings.
It is amazing how at a festival Dorje Shugden manages for you to have a personalized festival meeting up with everyone you need to and having the conversations you need to have. Some of the highlights for me were as follows:
I have much more I will write about my experience at the Summer Festival, but an additional resolution I have made is to make my blog postings shorter and more readable. So I will sign off here for now. The main point is the virtual world is great for being able to maintain your connection with your global Sangha family, but it is no substitute for reconnecting with your spiritual family live. While sometimes our karma may not allow it, in our heart we should always maintain the wish to be with them and to reconnect with them every opportunity we get. In my view, this is vital for our continued spiritual progress and has the added benefit of creating the causes to meet once again our spiritual tradition in all our future lives between now and our eventual enlightenment!
| Dorje Shugden is my real Sangha now. I need to surrender my life entirely to him. I need to surrender my retreat to him and his control. He emanates exactly what I need to work on, and my job is to practice Dharma in the face of whatever arises. He has the power to harness my virtuous and negative karma for my enlightenment. |
| Ultimately, I need to completely surrender myself to DS and see what happens. |
| The request for this life can be ‘please help me to be ready to leave at the end of this life.’ This eliminates the pride of it is a given while still keeping the value of having made a definitive decision to leave at the end of this life. It also specifies what I must do between now and then, namely get ready. |
| It is also a good idea for me to start doing the full Dorje Shugden part because it is by wishing for the Dharma to flourish and be protected in the world that I create the causes for it to flourish in my mind and in my world. My whole world (whole mind) need to be freed, not just me. For this to happen, the whole world must have pure spiritual teachings and wish to follow them. For myself, I apply effort to gain realizations so that I can later help others with them. If I gain realizations with this intention, then the conditions will arrange themselves for me to be able to share them. For others, I pray to Dorje Shugden that he cares for them in the most appropriate ways according to their karmic dispositions. I am currently quite limited in what I can do directly for others, but he is without limit. They are my spiritual children, but I lack the ability to care for them. I must entrust them into his care. To not do so is to neglect them. What good parent neglects their children? |
| These are some of the dedications/requests I make to Dorje Shugden: |
| 1. I offer you every atom in my body, every thought in my mind, every appearance in my world, please use them all for the enlightenment of all beings. |
| 2. I entrust my life completely to you. Please do with me whatever needs to be done. |
| 3. Please purify everything that stands in the way of you completely taking over my life, internally and externally. |
| 4. Please protect and guide my retreat. |
| 5. Please do not let me arrive at death not being ready to go to the pure land. |
| 6. May my every action be dedicated to building my pure land. |
| 7. Please help me to take my place within VGL’s holy mandala. |
| I should request Dorje Shugden, “I entrust my life to you, please be my enlightened Game Master.” |
| If you engage in the mental action of recognizing everything that appears as having been emanated by Dorje Shugden, this mental action plants the karma on your mind to have this actually be the case in the future, where everything that does arise is indeed emanated by him. This mental action gives him the karmic material to work with. Further, by adopting this recognition now, he enters into every appearance that appears now, and through this you receive his wisdom blessings. His blessings function to bestow upon you the wisdom to understand how everything that does arise is indeed perfect for your enlightenment and that of all living beings. With this understanding, there is no basis for generating delusions with respect to anything that arises. |
| I need to have DS take over my entire world, not only for me but for all of the beings in my dream. The pure world I am building has him as its govenor. I request him to manage and govern this world, so that everything that karmic ally arises is perfect for the swiftest possible enlightenment of each and every living being. I request that he takes all the beings of my dream into his loving care and protection. That everything that arises to the mind of every being function as a powerful cause of their enlightenment. I request that things not be uncontrolled by the SC mind, but controlled by him. By me making these requests and maintaining this recognition, it will become the reality of my dream. In the short run, in the form of wisdom blessings; and in the long run, in the form of karmic emanations arising from these mental actions. I will gain the wisdom to be able to understand how anything that happens to anybody is actually perfect for their enlightenment, then I simply share my perspective with them. They can then come to see how it is perfect for them as well, and then they can happily relate to their adversity in this way. Then we can use the suffering generated by SC as a means of destroying it. Also, by making these requests, I create the causes for him to take over my life and to protect me. |
| Dorje Shugden is not limited to managing what externally arises, but he is more powerful at managing what internally arises. I have weakly relied upon him for that. He is even more powerful for what secretly arises. I have not relied upon him at all for that. Much of my motivation of late has been aimed at whatever is best for these external changes. This is good, but it is largely a worldly motivation. I need to not lose sight of the bigger picture. |
| My requesting DS to take over the management of your karmic dream, requesting him to use every appearance for the enlightenment of all beings, and then adopting the view that this is now the case, everything is indeed arising in this way (believing faith) then you will gain the wisdom that sees how this is in fact the case. Then nothing will be a problem for you, and you will have the wisdom necessary to help others see things the way you do and thereby they will not have a problem with anything either. In this way, you transform your samsaric world into the experience of being in the pure land. Then, in dependence upon this view and these mental actions over a long period of time, you plant the karma on your mind so that this becomes your living reality. Then you are actually in the pure land. |